Editorial team wants control
Marketing wants to add, edit, publish without filing engineering tickets. WordPress with a real block library nails this.
WordPress Development
A SeoMata WordPress build is a lean, block-based, custom-coded site where editors get real day-to-day independence and engineers do not fight a stack of plugins. We ship green Core Web Vitals, full schema, and a content model that lets marketing publish without an engineer.
90+
Lighthouse target
all four scores
< 6
Plugins in production
on the median build
0
Page-builders
no Elementor / Divi / WPBakery
< 1 day
New service page
editor → live
WordPress at SeoMata is a real engineering practice — custom block themes, ACF Pro, Composer-managed dependencies, version-controlled deploys, CI checks, managed hosting. We do not ship Elementor / Divi / WPBakery / theme-marketplace builds, because those make every long-term goal (performance, SEO scale, editor velocity, security) harder than it needs to be.
About 30% of our marketing-site engagements ship on WordPress; the rest on Next.js or Shopify. We default to WordPress when the editorial team needs deep day-to-day independence and the content model is the heart of the project.
0
Admin-side theme edits
everything in version control
100%
Composer-deployable
no plugin-zip uploads
90+
Lighthouse on launch
all four scores
When to use
Marketing wants to add, edit, publish without filing engineering tickets. WordPress with a real block library nails this.
Blog, resources, guides, news — the volume and cadence of editorial work make a code-first stack heavier than it needs to be.
Author profiles, roles, draft / review workflow, scheduled publish — WordPress's editorial model is hard to beat.
Kinsta / WP Engine / Pantheon / Pressable take the security + scaling + backup story off your plate.
You already have authors, processes, integrations on WordPress. Re-platforming would cost more than rebuilding inside WP.
A lean SeoMata WP build can ship a 20-page marketing site in 6 weeks. Next.js builds with similar scope take 8–12.
Services
Block themes built on the modern WordPress editor — no page-builder, no shortcode soup. Sections + blocks as real React-style components.
Advanced Custom Fields Pro for structured content. Per-template field definitions, helper text, conditional logic, repeater blocks where they earn their place.
Composer-managed custom plugins for integrations, custom post types, REST endpoints, admin UX. Everything versioned, nothing in `wp-content/uploads`.
For the right use case (smaller catalogues, integrated with content) — custom theme + lean plugin stack, no app sprawl.
Object cache (Redis / Memcached), full-page cache, image pipeline, plugin audit. Closes the Core Web Vitals gap most WP sites have.
Patching cadence, malware scan, audit log, two-factor admin, file-system permissions hardened. Tied to maintenance retainer (see /design-development/website-maintenance).
Stack
Modern editor only. Classic editor disabled unless a content type explicitly justifies it.
Roots Bedrock for sane WordPress architecture; ACF Pro for the content model. Everything Composer-managed.
Managed hosting — automatic backups, staging, CDN, security. No managing PHP / nginx / cron manually.
Object cache for dynamic content; page cache (host-provided or W3 Total Cache) for anonymous traffic.
Yoast or RankMath for SEO fields (we provide the schema; the plugin provides the editor UI). WP All Import for bulk migrations.
Sentry for error monitoring, WP CLI for automation, uptime checks on home + 5 key templates.
Process
Stakeholder interviews, content audit, ACF field design, plugin inventory. Output: brief + ACF schema.
Repo, Composer, Bedrock, custom block theme, deploy pipeline, staging URL in week one.
Custom blocks for hero, service module, FAQ, testimonial, comparison, etc. Templated pages designed against ACF schema.
CRM, analytics, scheduling, search, payment — wired against staging. Content migration via WP All Import or custom scripts.
Lighthouse + axe-core, cross-device QA, schema validation, security hardening, plugin audit.
Cutover, GSC validation, weekly checkpoints for 30 days, Runbook handoff.
Decision aid
Some clients ask about headless WordPress (WP as CMS, Next.js as front-end). The table below is the heuristic we use.
| Classic WordPress (our default) | Headless (WP + Next.js) | |
|---|---|---|
| Time to launch | 6–10 weeks | 10–16 weeks |
| Editor experience | Excellent (Gutenberg + blocks) | Good but preview can lag |
| Performance ceiling | High with caching | Higher (Edge SSR / SSG) |
| SEO ceiling | High (with Yoast / RankMath) | Higher (full IA + schema control in code) |
| Maintenance complexity | Lower (one stack) | Higher (two repos, two deploy pipelines) |
| When to choose | Marketing site, content velocity matters | Marketing + app share content; large multi-region SEO surface |
For ~80% of marketing-site engagements that need WordPress, classic is the right call. We only go headless when there is a genuine reason — shared content with an app, complex multi-tenant SEO, or a polyglot in-house engineering team.
Scope
Audit + content model
ACF Pro schema + per-template field documentation + editor preview.
Bedrock scaffold
Composer-managed, version-controlled, Roots-blessed WordPress.
Custom block theme
Modern editor only. Sections + blocks as React-style components.
Block library
15+ reusable blocks (hero, service, FAQ, comparison, testimonial, social proof, etc.).
SEO + schema
Yoast / RankMath + custom schema for Service / Article / FAQ / Organization / LocalBusiness.
Performance + caching
Redis object cache, page cache, image pipeline, plugin audit.
Security + admin hardening
Two-factor, audit log, malware scan, file permissions, wp-config hardening.
Editor training + Runbook
60-minute walkthrough, written guide, plus video for new editors.
Portfolio
No. Those page-builders make every long-term goal (performance, SEO, security, editor velocity) harder than it needs to be. We use the modern block editor with a custom block library that gives editors the same flexibility without the cost.
6–10 weeks for a typical 20–40 page marketing site. 10–16 weeks if WooCommerce or headless. 14+ weeks for multi-language or multi-site.
Yes — full content + URL + SEO migration. The standard migration playbook keeps organic traffic within 2% of baseline through cutover.
WooCommerce for the right size (under ~1k SKU, single-region, content-driven). For larger or multi-region stores we usually recommend Shopify Plus or Magento — see /design-development/shopify-development and /design-development/magento-development.
Kinsta / WP Engine / Pantheon / Pressable are our defaults. We can run on AWS / GCP with custom infra if needed, but managed WP hosting wins the cost / value question for ~90% of clients.
Yes — Gutenberg editor with our custom blocks. Editors see the actual block library, the live preview, the SEO fields, and the schema. No "talk to engineering" moments for routine content work.
Start with a free 30-minute WordPress audit. We will look at the current build (or planning brief), plugin stack, content workflow, and write back with a prioritised opportunity list — usually within 3 business days.
Related services
Next step
Start with a free WordPress audit. SeoMata will benchmark theme performance, plugin overhead, schema, and editorial workflow — and show you how the right architecture can improve rankings and conversion.